Skip to main content
Image of UT logo that reads The University of Texas at Austin
University Interscholastic League Logo
University Interscholastic League Logo

UIL Speech Judges

If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.

Russell Rowe

Current high school:
Carthage

Currently coaching?: Yes

Conference: 4A

Number of years coached: 9

Number of tournaments judged: 5

High school attended:
Nederland High School

Graduated high school: 1979

Participated in high school: Yes

Participated in college: Yes

Judging qualifications:
I have coached and judged extemp, LD Debate, and CX Debate for 9 years. My students regularly place at District and many advance to Regionals. Occassionally, I have had students advance to State (Extemp - 2, LD - 2, and CX - 6). I generally consider myself a tab judge. I generally prefer more traditional debate but will listen to more progressive styles. I have no pre-set opinions. I have one serious issue - I believe speaking events should consist of speaking rather than simply flashing each other evidence. I'm competent.

Judging Philosophy

CX

Rounds judged: 14
Judging approach: Tabula Rasa
Policy priority: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Evidence philosophy: Quality of evidence is more important than quantity of evidence
Paradigm: Tell me what I should vote on. Resolve the issues. I like to understand what you are saying. I need Kritiks to have clear alts. I really look for quality links on DA's. I believe most things are topical - within reason. I prefer for cases to be argues rather than simply generic attacks but recognize that isn't going to happen a great deal. Oddly enough, I believe inherency can win - but seldom see it. I prefer clear solvency but clearly recognize that the negative has to have some offense to overcome even a very limited solvency. I like stock issues - but clearly recognize most debates will not be resolved around them.

LD

Rounds judged: 8
Approach: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Philosophy:
Clear value and criterion links. I really dislike policy style argumentation in LD - counter-plans, advantages, disadvantages, etc. I'll listen - I just don't like it - which means it is easier for the other team to beat you. But they do have to beat you.

Contact Information

email: rrowe@carthageisd.org
cell: 903 2631316
office: 903 6932552

Availability Information

Meet types:
Invitational District Regional CX State State Meet

Qualified for:
CX
LD
Extemp
Congress

Travel

Region of residence:
5

I will travel to: 3 5 6