Skip to main content
Image of UT logo that reads The University of Texas at Austin
University Interscholastic League Logo
University Interscholastic League Logo

UIL Speech Judges

If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.

William Honea

Current high school:
Austin Johnson

Currently coaching?: No

Conference:

Number of years coached:

Number of tournaments judged: 10+

High school attended:
Athens High School

Graduated high school: 2019

Participated in high school: Yes

Participated in college: Yes

Judging qualifications:
2018 4A UIL CX State - 6th Place 2019 4A UIL CX State - Bronze Medal 2019 4A UIL CX State - Bronze Gavel 2019 4A UIL Congress State - Finalist 2019 4A UIL Persuasive Speaking State - 5th Place Multiple time national qualifier in debate at the collegiate level for Texas Tech University. I have been judging speech and debate for 4 years now. I also have experience coaching as a local consultant and at summer camps.

Judging Philosophy

CX

Rounds judged: 20+
Judging approach: Tabula Rasa
Policy priority: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Evidence philosophy: Quality of evidence is more important than quantity of evidence
Paradigm: Debate is a game. I believe that in a UIL setting it is important to maintain the accessible nature of our events. However, this does not preclude me from evaluating any argumentation style or topics. I read just about everything there is during my time as a debater. All I ask is that tricks like mumble spreading and pompous confusion be left outside of UIL rounds. Otherwise, you do you, and I will evaluate the arguments that are put before me.

LD

Rounds judged: 20+
Approach: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Philosophy:
In LD, I believe in the classic Value/Criterion debates. I think using that as our foundation for these debates provides a better starting point for moral resolve at the end. I am perfectly fine with any critical argumentation or theory debates. However, don’t just read them as a time suck or as a way to trick your opponent. They need to have a purpose. Otherwise, you do you, and I will evaluate the arguments put before me.

Contact Information

email: willhonea11@gmail.com
cell: 903 6766848
office:

Availability Information

Meet types:
District Regional CX State State Meet

Qualified for:
CX
LD
Extemp
Congress

Travel

Region of residence:
1

I will travel to: 1