UIL Speech Judges
If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.
Kalyn Mizelle McDaniel
Current high school:
None
Currently coaching?: No
Conference:
Number of years coached:
Number of tournaments judged: 0
High school attended:
Smithson Valley High School
Graduated high school: 2016
Participated in high school: No
Participated in college: Yes
Judging qualifications:
I am a second-year JD candidate at the University of Texas School of Law. I compete on UT's interscholastic moot court team, and following graduation, I intend to work as a civil rights litigator.
I grew up in a working-class family without exposure to the legal field, and I owe much of my path to law school to my experience as a collegiate debater. I came to college without any debate experience, and the team took a risk on me. That risk ultimately paid off due to my immediate success. In my first year, I won NCCFI nationals in CX debate and was the first-place speaker. Additionally, I was the first runner-up in LD at PKD nationals. I won various other speech awards throughout my first year. I competed again in my sophomore year but did not attend nationals because I studied abroad in Australia. When I returned to my university, I primarily focused on moot court.
My short career in debate had a massive impact on me. I learned from some incredible coaches and teammates, many of whom are full-time debate coaches now. I judged local high school competitions throughout college as well.
In the time between my undergrad and law school, I taught the LSAT. That experience cultivated my skills as an instructor. I tailor my instruction and feedback to each student and am eager to do the same as a judge.
Judging Philosophy
CX
Judging approach: Stock Issues
Policy priority: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Evidence philosophy: Quality of evidence is more important than quantity of evidence
Paradigm: My legal background inclines me to have a strong preference for precision and careful use of language. I strongly prefer quality of evidence over quantity, and students who tailor their arguments carefully really impress me. I fall somewhere between a strict stock issue judge and one who values the integration of policy. I don't love spreading, but if I can follow it, I am not completely opposed. Ultimately, I want this experience to teach meaningful skills and I am eager to give practical feedback to students.
LD
Approach: Resolution of substantive issues is more important than communication skills
Philosophy:
Contact Information
email: mcdaniel.kalyn@gmail.com
cell:
office:
Availability Information
Meet types:
District
Regional
CX State
State Meet
Qualified for:
CX
LD
Extemp
Prose/Poetry
Travel
Region of residence:
1
I will travel to: 1