Skip to main content
Image of UT logo that reads The University of Texas at Austin
University Interscholastic League Logo
University Interscholastic League Logo

UIL Speech Judges

If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.

Rachel Cantrell

Current high school:
Mabank

Currently coaching?: Yes

Conference: 4A

Number of years coached: 8

Number of tournaments judged: 1

High school attended:
Sulphur Springs High School

Graduated high school: 2003

Participated in high school: No

Participated in college: No

Judging qualifications:
I have 8 years experience coaching and judging LD, congress, extemporaneous speaking, and prose/poetry interpretation. I have a PhD in English with a focus on written discourse. I prefer quality and depth of argumentation to mere quantity of argumentation. I think a judge should base the decision on which debater more effectively resolved the central questions of the resolution rather than on insignificant dropped arguments. Please keep your delivery at a moderate pace and clear. LD - I lean towards a more traditional LD Value/Criterion debate. I'll listen to progressive argumentation, but I feel that you'll have to do more work for me to go for it. I appreciate clear analysis of why you should win in the final rebuttals.

Judging Philosophy

CX

Rounds judged: 0
Judging approach: Stock Issues
Policy priority: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Evidence philosophy: Quality of evidence is more important than quantity of evidence
Paradigm: While I am comfortable judging any type of round, my preference is a more traditional round. Debate rounds that are more progressive (kritikal affs, performance, etc...) are totally fine, but you'll do best to slow down and go for depth over breadth here. Writing the ballot for me in the last few speeches can be helpful.

LD

Rounds judged: 1
Approach: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Philosophy:
I lean towards a more traditional LD Value/Criterion debate. I'll listen to progressive argumentation, but I feel that you'll have to do more work for me to go for it. I appreciate clear analysis of why you should win in the final rebuttals.

Contact Information

email: rncantrell@mabankisd.net
cell: 903 3306909
office:

Availability Information

Meet types:
Invitational District Regional CX State State Meet Congress Region Congress State

Qualified for:
LD
Extemp
Prose/Poetry
Congress

Travel

Region of residence:
2

I will travel to: 1 2 5