UIL Speech Judges
If you have corrections, questions or comments regarding this information, please notify The UIL Speech and Debate department at speech@uiltexas.org or 512-471-5883.
Marshall White
Current high school:
None
Currently coaching?: No
Conference:
Number of years coached:
Number of tournaments judged: 0
High school attended:
Huffman Hargrave
Graduated high school: 2013
Participated in high school: Yes
Participated in college: No
Judging qualifications:
- I competed in high school CX Debate from 2011-2013 and qualified for State 3A competition in 2012 & 2013.
- After high school, I judged CX Debate invitationals in my region for 2 years and judged CX District Tournaments for my former highschool (Huffman Hargrave) for 4 years.
Judging Philosophy
CX
Judging approach: Stock Issues
Policy priority: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Evidence philosophy: Quality of evidence is more important than quantity of evidence
Paradigm: My belief around CX Debate is that Affirmative must establish that their case adequately addresses the Stock Issues of the round; I look for the Affirmative to establish Significance (I consider Harms to be causal to the case's Significance and therefore, one and the same), Inherency and Solvency while remaining Topical to the resolution, and the Negative's burden is to disqualify the Affirmative's grounds by disproving the Significance, Inherency, Solvency or Topicality to the resolution.
LD
Approach: Communication skills and resolution of substantive issues are of equal importance
Philosophy:
Contact Information
email: themarshdarsh@gmail.com
cell:
office:
Availability Information
Meet types:
Invitational
District
Regional
CX State
State Meet
Qualified for:
CX
Extemp
Travel
Region of residence:
3
I will travel to: 1 2 3 5 6
